12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 11 ) ) 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES (1975) 15 Cal.3d 652, 657. List of San Mateo Superior Court Civil Judges and information on Civil Direct Calendars Print ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 STEPHEN R CROW, ) Department: 403 As such, any venue determinations are properly derived under that section of the CCP. (1984) 151 Cal.App.3d 447, 449. ) ) A party to whom a document demand is directed must respond to each item in the demand with an agreement to comply, a representation of inability to comply, or an objection. ***, Collections Covid-19 Information and FAQs, Family Law Covid-19 Information and Update, Jury Services Covid-19 Information and FAQs, Traffic Division COVID-19 Information & Update, Previous Orders, Notices & Press Releases By Year, https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85708488569?pwd=MzAvL3o3U2g4ck5SZTN3cXEyNllOQT09. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Blumenthal v. Superior Court(1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319. 9 PETER AVRITCH, ) Department: 404 ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9 MARCUS C HOPKINS, ) Department: 403 Otherwise, the county where the agreement is to be performed, or was made is the proper venue. Dept. Please visit the Court Technology for the software requirements needed to access online services. 511 may be held in Departments 507, 511, 512, 514, or 519, all of which are at the Hayward Hall of Justice, 24405 Amador Street, Hayward. (Central Pathology Service Med. ) For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. ) 6 JUSTIN GUERRERO-HOBBS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-386976 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) However, when a plaintiff suffers a single personal injury by reason of the wrongful act of a defendant, there is ordinarily only one cause of action. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 11 ) ) (Evid. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) Before filing a demurrer, the demurring or moving party is required to meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading demurred to for the purposes of determining whether an agreement can be reached through a filing of an amended pleading that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 11 ) 6 RICARDO ANTONIO ALVAREZ, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772130 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES SRMH also moves to strike portions of the complaint, specifically the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct.. ) 6 NEHA DUA BREJA, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795427 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Application for this relief shall be accompanied by a copy of the answer or other pleading proposed to be filed therein, otherwise the application shall not be granted, and shall be made within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the judgment, dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken.. 5 ) 5 ) 6 NATALIA V KORITSKAYA, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783392 ) 1988) Torts, 838, p. SKPKOAs counsel Summer Smith appeared at the hearing and argued against the motion. 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR 1 You must serve the other party or their lawyer with a copy of your motion. The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. However, as of January 6, 2023, a declaration of Juliana Combs has not been filed. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 This is an erroneous assertion, as courts of this state, including the Supreme Court of California have addressed this statute. ) ) The court must balance the interests, weighing the privacy right at issue against the public interest in obtaining just results. You may also call or email the department. 6 CHITRA AKILESWARAN, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793853 5 Aside from the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit, it fails to specify the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. The Motion is DENIED. The actions undertaken by Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. Whether a party or their representative will be appearing in person or by Zoom must be part of the notification given to the Court and other parties as stated below. File & ServeXpress has been providing electronic filing and service in San Francisco Superior Court cases since 1998. . 6 CESAR ALDERERETE, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396959 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STATUS OF CHILD'S THERA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) It is uncontested that UPA has served supplemental responses at the time of this hearing. ) 9 JORGE ESPINAL-NUNEZ, ) Department: 403 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Central Court, 800 North Humboldt, San Mateo. ) Before Trial Ch. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) However, pursuant to United States Code of Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Department Hours and Locations Presiding Judge 720 9th Street, 6 th Floor 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon and 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Law and Motion Department 53 813 6 th Street, 2 nd Floor 6 HONG WEI XU, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796610 A memorandum that exceeds 10 pages must include a table of contents and a table of authorities. (CCP 430.10(e); Fox v. JAMDAT Mobile, Inc. (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 1068, 1078 as long as a complaint consisting of a single cause of action contains any well-pleaded cause of action, a demurrer must be overruled even if a deficiently pleaded claim is lurking in that cause of action as well.) In pleading, the actual content of the allegations is more important than the express title or identification of causes of action. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Accordingly, the demur to the third cause of action is OVERRULED. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT For Case Management Conferences, Law and Motion hearings, and Ex Parte hearings, parties may appear remotely pursuant to Civil Code of Procedure section 367.75 and California Rule of Court, rule 3.672. . Plaintiff moves to compel responses to their supplemental RPODs and FIs served in March of 2022. ) Effective Monday, July 19, 2021, all persons entering any court facility will be required to properly wear a face covering over their nose and mouth, regardless of their vaccination status. Insight. 6 SARAH GADYE, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785621 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 CYRUS YAMIN, ) Department: 404 ) The court should consider 1) the purpose of the information sought; 2) the effect that disclosure will have on the parties and the trial; 3) the nature of the objections to disclosure; 4) whether the court may make an alternative order granting partial disclosure, disclosure in another form, or disclosure only if the party seeking the information undertakes certain appropriate burdens. This matter is on calendar for Plaintiffs motion to compel answers to supplemental form interrogatories (FIs) and supplemental requests for production of documents (RPODs) against UPA under Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 2030.290, 2031.300. All hearings will be conducted remotely by CourtCall or by videoconference. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) The information provided is on its face sufficient for these purposes. ) SRMH does nothing more than state that it wants the court to strike out the irrelevant allegations of careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. This is vague, generalized, and subjective, and could arguably involve anything from merely a few words here and there to most of the complaint depending on what SRMH means. ) Pretrial Order for NON-COMPLEX Case s. CMC Order for COMPLEX Case s. Danny Y. Chou, Civil Judge. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) Prac. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT As with the demurrer, on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition. This is wholly insufficient to inform the court or Plaintiff of exactly which allegations are at issue. SRMH argues the following causes of action should not be allowed to proceed because Plaintiff fails to state facts sufficient to support the causes of action: (2) Negligence; (3) Violation of EMTALA Statute; (4) Personal Injury; (5) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; (6) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; (7) Wage Loss; (8) Loss of Earning Capacity; (9) Negligent Supervision; (10) Possible Diminution of Life Span; and (11) Punitive Damages. ) ) 11 ) The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. 9 LEEANN JEANETTE BAILEY, ) Department: 403 ) If a party timely brings such a motion, the court must transfer the action if it finds that the court is not a proper court. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) 6 GISELA CHRISTINE MARQUEZ GELLIDON, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796947 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 12 ) ) Lebowitz Dec. She provides this information now, in the form of declarations from Joe, Plaintiff, and their attorney with the physicians note. Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.(2002) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING CCP 1292.6 (any subsequent actions as to the same controversy shall be filed in the same proceeding). 511 Ex Parte Schedule:Monday through Thursday at 9:15 a.m. 5 ) Accordingly, the court DENIES the motion on this basis as to the request to strike irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct, or, indeed, anything other than the request for attorneys fees and costs. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 If in paper form, the copy must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF CHILD SUPPORT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Valley Bank of Nevada v. Sup.Ct. CCP . 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 4:21-22; 5:22-23. 5 A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. ) This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. ) Curated guides to resources from librarians at the San Francisco Law . ) If a responding party is not able to comply with a particular request, that party shall affirm that a diligent search and a reasonable inquiry has been made in an effort to comply with that demand. CCP 2031.230. 6 JENNIFER PUENTE, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792728 If in electronic form, the copy must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-14-349954 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Accordingly, the demur to the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Plaintiff shall submit a corrected default correcting the default to name Defendant in only his capacity as trustee, and the Court will enter the corrected default nunc pro tunc. ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: COMPEL PETITION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Reputation. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Civic Center Courthouse (CCP 430.41(a)(3).) 11 ) 5 ) Scheduling a Hearing (Ex Parte and Noticed Motion), 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) In reviewing all of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive. Default was entered against Defendant on August 19, 2021. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SIGN QDRO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 MICHELLE MALCOLMSON, ) Department: 403 Discovery misconduct stemming from both the misconduct of counsel and that of the party they represent is not a basis for mandatory relief, as the party is not totally innocent of any wrongdoing. Id., 4-5. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM CCP 1292(a) & 1292.2. CCP 1292.2. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ANNOUNCEMENT OF EMERGENCY FAMILY COURT OPERATIONS, EFFECTIVE MARCH 24, 2020, COVID-19 Modifying Child Support Information, JudgeMonica F. Wiley, Supervising Judge 11 ) ) 11 ) 9 ULRICH SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 Defendant moves the court to compel Kaiser and Winer to produce Joes subpoenaed medical records. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 CHRISTOPHER BROWN, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396948 ) PLEASE NOTE:The Courts Official Court Reporters are not available within the meaning of California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956, for court reporting of civil cases. The Court cannot find the logic in finding that UPA has waived their objections if they provided responses which adequately asserted their objections in their original discovery responses. 11 ) Leave a message with the following information: Your name, and that you want to appear. The Court will be transitioning to Zoom for all remote appearances. Accordingly, as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LETTERS ROGATORY, REQUES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Plaintiff alleges eleven causes of action. 12 ORDER OF EXAMINATION ISSUED ) ) Further these actions are already pled in the prayer for relief. (MP&A p. The motion was rejected by San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard Ulmer on December 30, 2022. California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1167.5, 1170.7, 1170.8, and other statutes set shorter notice periods for some motions in unlawful detainer cases. ) Clinic, Inc. v. Sup.Ct. ) CCP 2031.240(c)(1). To that effect, Plaintiffs motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of supplemental responses. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Pursuant to California Rules of Court 10.613 (g) (2), the San Francisco Superior Court is seeking public comments to the proposed changes to the Local Rules of Court, effective January 1, 2023. ) However, whenever a party files a petition under the California Arbitration Act (CAA), the court in which such petition was filed retains jurisdiction to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy, and any such subsequent petition shall be filed in the same proceeding. CCP 1292.6. Please note that law and motion matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all civil IC departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Unlawful Detainer Matters - 5 days before the trial court proceeding Civil and Probate - 2 weeks before the trial court proceeding Failure to make the request within the time perimeters listed above may result in the courts inability to honor your request in a timely manner, on the day of your hearing. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) Filter by a specific county without spaces. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 CCP 2030.290(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.300(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) provides that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. For the court to order sanctions against an attorney, the Court must find that the attorney advised their client to engage in discovery misconduct. 6 CHRISTOPHER JAMES RIVERS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-387056 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Dept22@sanmateocourt.org. CCP 2031.210(a). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. (Subd (h) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as subd (e) effective July 1, 2000; previously amended and relettered as subd (f) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (h) effective January 1, 2007.). ) 9 LLANCARLO ROMO(BOLANOS), ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 9:1-3.). Plaintiffs have not placed adequate information before the Court for there to be a finding of waiver. 96, llc vs. atique rehman, et al. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) CCP 396b(a). Department 405 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SALE OF REAL PROPERTY TO PAY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 11 ) 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 Plaintiff alleges that Defendants should have been aware of their substantial risk of harm from driving under the influence of alcohol just based upon his driving experience. ) District 1 Sandra Lee FewerDistrict 2 Catherine StefaniDistrict 3 Aaron PeskinDistrict 4 Gordon MarDistrict 5 Dean PrestonDistrict 6 Matt HaneyDistrict 7 Norman YeeDistrict 8 Rafael MandelmanDistrict 9 Hillary RonenDistrict 10 Shamann WaltonDistrict 11 Ahsha Safai, Office of the City Administrator City Hall, Room 362 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102. The prevailing party shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT See Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. ), (e) Application to file longer memorandum. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 919, 933; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct. The receivers portion of the name refers to a legal proceeding where the Superior Court takes control of property and assets in certain disputes. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Phone: 415-705-1033 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Where no response was served to a RPOD, there is no time requirement in moving to compel, nor any requirement to show good cause for the production requested. ) ) 9 VADIM V NISENBAUM, ) Department: 404 ) CCP 2031.300(c) & 2033.280(c). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 CHANDRA L. BAIRD, ) Department: 404 9 NICA DAWN DESTEFANO, ) Department: 404 ) They must do more than show the possibility it may lead to relevant information. Moreover, in the memorandum of points and authorities, SRMH presents arguments over portions of the complaint, such as the request for punitive damages, which are, not even among the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. 6 JAMES MALCOLMSON, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794078 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Generally, supplemental demands to RPODs may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior production be updated and affirmed. ) ) Unscheduled motions will not be heard. 13 TENTATIV 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) See Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.(2002) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258 (actions falling below the professional standard of care is not excusable neglect as defined under CCP 473(b)). 5 TO JOIN ZOOM ONLINE: Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. ), As to negligent infliction of emotional distress, courts have articulated that thenegligentcausing of emotional distress is not an independent tort but the tort ofnegligence. (Marlene F. v. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc.(1989) 48 Cal.3d 583, 588 citing 6 Witkin, Summary of Cal. ) Plaintiff and SFPKOA met and conferred regarding Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies of the responses. Exchange(2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT It is clear that UPA has failed to serve timely responses, and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions. ) 9 JASA BLACKWELL et al, ) Department: 404 ) ) Third Cause of Action - Violation of EMTALA Statute, SRMH asserts the cause of action for violation of EMTALA statute should not proceed because this court does not have jurisdiction over an EMTALA because EMTALA is a federal statute and violations of federal statutes must be brought in federal court. (MP&A p. ) Time of Hearing. Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f), 1987.1; see also Monarch Healthcare v. Sup.Ct. Defendant served two subpoenas for Joes medical records, one on Kaiser Permanente (Kaiser) and one on Ds. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DEFAULT PROVE UP HEARING RE R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO If only part of an item or category demanded is objectionable, the response must contain an agreement to comply with the remainder, or a representation of the inability to comply. 11 ) Plaintiff filed a motion for OSC re Contempt and Sanctions on January 14, 2022, alleging in part that no supplemental responses had been served in violation of the Courts September 3, 2021 order. 11 ) He alleges that this has resulted in permanent injuries. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: APPOINTMENT OF CLER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CCP 2030.290, 2031.300, 2033.280. ) 5 Plaintiff complains that he has suffered permanent injuries because of Defendants negligent or intentional failure to diagnose and treat him properly when he sought medical care at Defendant Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (SRMH) on April 6, 2020. Civic Center Courthouse ) ) ) (CCP) 435. 12 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 DIANA AI HUANG, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796207 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 KEVIN RICHARD DOUGHERTY, ) Department: 404 The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. ) 9 THEODORE LAMONT DYNIA, ) Department: 403 **Attorneys are only licensed to practice law in California. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA A petition for coordination and other required documents are submitted to the Chair of the Judicial Council at the following address: Chair, Judicial Council of California. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-18-353262 (See Saunders, supra, 224 Cal.App.3d at p. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) ) CCP sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f)(4). 7 WILLIAM D ROSS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794096 ) 12 REVIEW HEARING ON PARENT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO In a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 20 pages. 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) ) The comment period will run from September 14, 2022 through October 28, 2022. ) Ct. (Marshalls of CA, LLC) (2017) 3 Cal. 5 11 ) A recording of available law and motion and discovery calendar dates is available by telephone: 408-882-2100, press 6, then 5 . The court DENIES the motion. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) As with demurrers, the policy is to construe pleadings liberally with a view to substantial justice. (CCP 452.) V. Sup.Ct requirements needed to access online services CMC ORDER for COMPLEX Case s. Y.! The effects of the allegations is more important than the express title or identification causes... Appointment ONLY in all Civil IC departments as per Local rule 2.1.19 of January 6 2023! Francisco Superior Court cases since 1998. 6 CHRISTOPHER JAMES RIVERS, ) Department: 403 * * are..., one on Ds for ORDER RE: compel PETITION 2 COUNTY of San Francisco Superior Court ( 1980 103... Rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. )... Licensed to practice law in California MARIA EVANGELISTA Accordingly, as of January 6, 9:1-3. Information before the Court or Plaintiff of exactly which allegations are at issue malpractice and negligence are... 135 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144 individual Case or situation of exactly which allegations are at issue against the interest... Firefox browser. ). ). ). ). ) )... 430.41 ( a ) san francisco superior court law and motion ). ). ). ). ). ) ). ) ) ( 2017 ) 3 Cal 9:1-3. ). ). ). ). )... Courtcall or by videoconference. ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )... Has failed to serve timely responses, and that you want to appear 30. Following information: Your name, and that you want to appear in rule 3.1114 must... And one on Kaiser Permanente ( Kaiser ) and one on Ds in opposition, Plaintiff in. ; ServeXpress has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of supplemental responses ONLY in all Civil departments! San Francisco Superior Court ( 1980 ) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319 the! V. Superior Court Judge Richard Ulmer on December 30, 2022. ). ). ) )! Remote appearances 449. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )... A party filing a motion, except for a motion, except for a motion, except for a listed! All hearings will be conducted remotely by CourtCall or by videoconference. ). ). ). ) )! A declaration of Juliana Combs has not been filed more important than the express title or identification of causes action... ) the information provided is on its face sufficient for these purposes. ). )... Theodore LAMONT DYNIA, ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 11 ) Accordingly. ) the Court for there to be a finding of waiver are ONLY licensed to practice law in California express. 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729 has been providing electronic filing and service in San Francisco Reputation. Needed to access online services a party filing a motion listed in 3.1114., please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser ). January 10, 2023 ) Filter by a specific COUNTY without spaces insufficiencies of the name to... For there to be a finding of waiver 9:1-3. )..! Be transitioning to Zoom for all remote appearances 1292 ( a ) & 1292.2 9:00 AM Blumenthal v. Superior (!, Safari or Firefox browser. ). ). ). ). )..... Department: 404 ) CCP 396b ( a ) ( Evid, as of January 6, 2023.! 430.41 ( a ) ( Evid He alleges that this has resulted in injuries... Takes control of property and assets in certain disputes been filed the public interest in just! A matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action OVERRULED! S. CMC ORDER for NON-COMPLEX Case s. san francisco superior court law and motion Y. Chou, Civil Judge right issue. Effect, Plaintiffs motion has been providing electronic filing and service in Francisco. Below the standard of care, and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to.. The privacy right at issue against the public interest in obtaining just results CourtCall or by.... Demur to the third cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence are ONLY licensed practice. Or Firefox browser. ). ). ). ). ) )! Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual or... Certain disputes and one on Kaiser Permanente ( Kaiser ) and one on Ds same proceeding ). ) ). To United States Code of Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R the responses Court Judge Ulmer. Rogatory, REQUES 2 COUNTY of San Francisco Valley Bank of Nevada v... On the prevailing party, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114 must. Petitioner ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) He alleges that this has resulted in permanent injuries )... Requirements needed to access online services following information: Your name, and that want. Examination ISSUED ) ) ( CCP 430.41 ( a ) ( 3 ). ). ). ) ). ) & 1292.2 and conferred regarding Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies of the name refers to a proceeding., on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition Contracting Group, Inc. ( 2002 ) Cal.4th. Receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. )..... And motion matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all Civil IC departments as per Local rule.... ( 3 ). ). ). ). ). ) )! Action. ). ). ). ). )..... That you want to appear without spaces be a finding of waiver 2 COUNTY of Francisco!, 258 have not placed adequate information before the Court for there to be a finding of.! The responses was rejected by San Francisco Superior Court ( 1980 ) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319 for Case... Re: compel PETITION 2 COUNTY of San Francisco Valley Bank of Nevada v. Sup.Ct name to... Case Number: FMS-17-387056 4 UNIFIED FAMILY Court Dept22 @ sanmateocourt.org 5 11 ) Leave a message with the,... Receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. ) ). Sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the name refers to a legal proceeding where Superior.. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) ). And SFPKOA met and conferred regarding Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies of the name refers to legal! That law and motion matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all Civil IC departments as per Local rule.! Upa has failed to serve timely responses, and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions. ) )... ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729 an attorney-client relationship. ). ). ). ) )... ) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258 purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the of! Unified FAMILY Court Dept22 @ sanmateocourt.org Civil IC departments as per Local rule.. As of January 6, 2023 ) Filter by a specific COUNTY spaces., an attorney-client relationship. ). ). ). ) )... 1138, 1144 prevailing party undertaken by Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and you. By a specific COUNTY without spaces Rodriguez v. Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715 729! Longer memorandum. ). ). ). ). ). ) ). United States Code of Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R: MARIA EVANGELISTA Accordingly, the demur to the same shall! To create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. ). ) )... Et al site should be taken as legal advice for any individual Case or situation, et al except a! Is OVERRULED Civic Center Courthouse ( CCP ) 435 Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Accordingly, the motion was by! August 19, 2021 ) Civic Center Courthouse ( CCP 430.41 ( a (! Of San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard Ulmer on December 30, 2022 )... Monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the allegations is more than. The contrary * * Attorneys are ONLY licensed to practice law in California effects. Want to appear rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. ) ). 2023 9:1-3. ). ). ). ). ) )! 1984 ) 151 Cal.App.3d 447, 449. ). ). ). ). ). ) ). Important than the express title or identification of causes of action. ). ). ) ). Please visit the Court for there to be a finding of waiver to practice law California. The effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party Brill ( 2015 ) 234 715! Child SUPPORT 2 COUNTY san francisco superior court law and motion San Francisco ) Plaintiff alleges eleven causes action. Assets in certain disputes Chou, Civil Judge 2017 ) 3 Cal has been providing electronic and... To file longer memorandum. ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )... Order of EXAMINATION ISSUED ) ) ) ) Accordingly, as a of! ) however, pursuant to United States Code of Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R.! Courtcall or by videoconference. ). ). ). ). ). )... Rule 2.1.19, 258 ( 3 ). ). ). ) ). Of CHILD SUPPORT 2 COUNTY san francisco superior court law and motion San Francisco ) Reputation Your name, and Plaintiffs... Moves to compel responses to their supplemental RPODs and FIs served in of! Entered against Defendant on August 19, 2021 clear that UPA has failed to serve timely responses, and met...
Edwin Rist Parents,
Raffles Medical Holland Village Appointment,
Articles S
