_____
We’re going to start with Mormon Stories. (Mormon Stories, along with CES Letter, are two of the most prominent critics of the divine authenticity of the Book of Mormon.) I don’t know how popular or influential Mormon Stories is, but a lot of people read/view their materials.
Here is one measure: youtube subscribers.
Mormon Stories channel: 16,845 subscribers, 728 videos
Book of Mormon Central: 9,755 subscribers, 637 videos
Remember, Book of Mormon Central has spent millions of dollars to develop and promote its content. I doubt Mormon Stories has spent more than a couple hundred thousand dollars.
(Note: BMC Studios has 4,238 subscribers and 7 videos. BMC en Espanol has 19,319 subscribers with 653 videos. BMC videos in Spanish have far more views than their videos in English, a topic we’ll discuss soon on this blog: http://www.bookofmormoncentralamerica.com/)
_____
We shouldn’t be surprised if Mormon Stories has more influence among English-speakers than Book of Mormon Central.
Critics of the Book of Mormon have effectively used M2C as a tool for years. (M2C is the Mesoamerican/two-Cumorahs theory that claims the “hill in New York” where Joseph got the plates was not the Hill Cumorah of Mormon 6:6, despite the teachings of prophets and apostles.)
Elder Joseph Fielding Smith warned in the 1930s that M2C would cause members of the Church to become confused and disturbed in their faith in the Book of Mormon. He repeated that warning when he was President of the Quorum of the Twelve. The fulfillment of his teaching is evident all around us today.
In a courtroom, lawyers object when their opponents badger witnesses by asking the same questions over and over. They stand and say “Asked and answered,” and the judge usually sustains the objection. You’ll see that many of the arguments by the critics were “asked and answered” in 1834-5. The answers are in the eight historical letters that Oliver Cowdery wrote, including Letter VII on the Hill Cumorah.
The questions persist because LDS intellectuals don’t accept the answers Oliver gave, including his declaration that it is a fact that the final battles took place at the hill in New York.
_____
Long-time readers here know this blog started as an evaluation of M2C.
M2C was developed in the late 1800s by faithful RLDS scholars. It was part of the doctrinal competition between the RLDS and LDS churches. The LDS Church, under President Joseph F. Smith, sought to purchase the Hill Cumorah in New York. The RLDS Church said, in effect, “go ahead, that’s not Cumorah anyway.”
Over the objection of LDS leaders, faithful LDS scholars adopted the RLDS position (often without acknowledging it originated with the RLDS). In the 1970s-1980s, M2C prevailed among scholars at BYU, who began teaching it to students.
Because of the academic cycle, M2C was promulgated through CES and was enthroned as the default explanation for the geography of the Book of Mormon.
Now, M2C is implicit in LDS artwork, media, visitors centers, curriculum at CES and BYU, and, well, just about everywhere. You see it displayed in LDS chapels around the world, in the illustrations in the missionary edition of the Book of Mormon, and even at the Missionary Training Center in Provo.
In my view, M2C is a mistake, even a hoax, for all the reasons I’ve explained on my other blog:
http://www.bookofmormoncentralamerica.com/
_____
Our first Mormon Stories article to review is found here:
https://www.mormonstories.org/truth-claims/the-books/the-book-of-mormon/hill-cumorah/
When I do these reviews, I put the original in blue so it’s easy to identify, with my comments in red. My notes are lettered and found at the end.
[Note: For new readers, I consider President Oliver Cowdery’s 1835 Letter VII as the single most authoritative explanation of the Hill Cumorah, as corroborated by teachings before and after that letter was published. Letter VII was republished many times, at least twice at the direction of Joseph Smith, and was copied into Joseph’s journal as part of his life history. For more, see: http://www.lettervii.blogspot.com/]
_____
My first observation: this article is anonymous. That’s good in a sense because none of my comments are personal anyway; I focus on the words, the facts, and the arguments made. I don’t care who wrote them.
Anonymous articles are problematic, though, when cited as authority. Two examples come to mind:
The 1842 Times and Seasons articles that the M2C citation cartel constantly cites, and the LDS Gospel Topics Essays that are subject to change at any moment without notice.
This Mormon Stories article could be changed at any time, which is another reason why I archived it here. Maybe my review here will prompt some corrections.
_____
The gist of this argument is the same as that made by the M2C intellectuals.
Both groups claim that the Hill Cumorah of Mormon 6:6 cannot be in western New York. Like the M2C intellectuals, Mormon Stories uses a misinterpretation of the text to claim huge numbers of combatants, claims there is no evidence of the battles, and claims that the depository could not be located in the hill in New York.
_____
HILL CUMORAH
ESTABLISHING CUMORAH IN NEW YORK
THE CIVIL WAR COMPARISON
POPULATION PERSPECTIVE
[Note: This entire section is based on the false reading of Ether 15; it’s merely a straw man logical fallacy. I think we can all agree that if the text actually said millions of people died at Cumorah in one battle, we would not find it believable.]
B.H. ROBERTS QUESTIONS CUMMORAH
LDS CHURCH CONFIRMS N.Y. LOCATION
- Gordon Hinkley stood at the hill in 1977 and repeated that it happened there.
- Elder George Albert Smith, Conference Report, April 1906, 56.
- Apostle Orson Pratt, Feb. 11, 1872 Journal of Discourses Vol. 14, 331.
- President Marion G. Romney, LDS General Conference, October 4, 1975, Ensign Nov. 1975, 35.
- Apostle LeGrand Richards, A Marvelous Work and a Wonder, ch 7.
- Elder George Reynolds, The Story of the Book of Mormon, ch.69, 325.
MODERN CUMORAH CONTRADICTIONS – NOT THAT HILL

- Journal of Book of Mormon Studies, BYU Studies: Archaeology and Cumorah Questions
RETURN OF THE PLATES TO CUMORAH
LEARN MORE
- The Hill Cumorah’s Cave, Cameron Packer, Maxwell Institute, BYU, 2004
- Where is Cumorah, Sandra Tanner
- List of Cumorah Location References
[1] Studies of Book of Mormon, 277.[2] New Witnesses for God, B.H. Roberts, 67.
[3] Studies of Book of Mormon, 277.
[4] Deseret Evening News, Aug 16, 1878.
[5] Journal of Discourses 1878, 19:38.
[6] Doctrines of Salvation, vol 3, 232-43.
[7] Apostle James E. Talmage, Articles of Faith, ch 14.
[8] Apostle Orson Pratt, Journal of Discourses, vol 14, 331.
[9] Elder George Albert Smith, Conference Report, April 1906, 56.
[10] Apostle Orson Pratt, Journal of Discourses, vol 16, 50.
[11] Apostle Orson Pratt, Journal of Discourses, vol 20, 62.
[12] Apostle Orson Pratt, Journal of Discourses, vol 22, 224.
[13] Apostle Orson Pratt, Journal of Discourses, vol 17, 24.
[14] President Anthony W. Ivins, Conference Report, April 1928-Morning Session.
[15] President Marion G. Romney, LDS General Conference, October 4, 1975, Ensign Nov. 1975, 35.
[16] Apostle Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, 1966, 174-175.
[17] Apostle Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, 1966, 174-175.
[18] Messenger and Advocate, vol 2, no 2, 221.
[19] BYU Studies
[20] Journal of Discourses 19:38, Brigham Young, June 17, 1877.
[21] Journal of Discourses, vol IV, 105.
[22] Liahona, Elders Journal June 25, 1929, 5-6.
Source: Book of Mormon Wars