Anyone who seeks unity and consensus must first ask, what am I willing to give up for the cause? Have I ever changed my mind about something important when I learned new facts, reconsidered priorities, or gained new wisdom?
Regarding Book of Mormon historicity, for decades I accepted what LDS scholars taught about the Mesoamerican/two Cumorahs theory (M2C). I accepted M2C because my CES and BYU teachers taught it, and I assumed they were the experts who had studied it.
Only later in life did I realize they had led me to disbelieve the prophets. Then, when I looked into Church history and relevant sciences for myself, I discovered that the prophets were correct all along.
So I changed my mind.
It wasn’t easy. It required some work to reorient my worldview on this issue.
I have plenty of M2C critics who resort to ad hominem and other logical errors to defend M2C. And that’s fine; we can all believe whatever we want.
By now, it’s obvious the M2C scholars and their employees and followers are driven by bias confirmation, not any pursuit of truth.
They made up their minds when they adopted the mark of M2C as their logo, which has been used by FARMS, the Maxwell Institute, and Book of Mormon Central.
There is no possibility of unity and consensus on this issue so long as one side (M2C) repudiates the teachings of the prophets and the other side embraces the teachings of the prophets.
_____
From Naval:
Everybody wants to change others. Nobody wants to be changed.
https://twitter.com/naval/status/1327509797294358529
Also:
It’s easier to change yourself than to change the world … Live the life you want other people to live.
From the comments:
“Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.” ~ Leo Tolstoy
Yesterday I was clever, so I wanted to change the world. Today I am wise, so I am changing myself.
Rumi
The internal dialog going in our head justifies our own thoughts, behaviours and actions. So we think we are right. When looking at others, we see only their actions. So we often think others are wrong or have done things the way they should not have.
Vik Shukla
Far easier to demand someone to change than to go through that uncomfortable process yourself. One requires work, other requires nothing.
Source: Book of Mormon Concensus
One thought on “Changing, unity, and consensus”
When I joined the Church, being a legacy member raised anti, the first thing I noticed was the complacency. It was like someone jumping into their dad’s car and making motor sounds while twisting the steering wheel. You could offer them the key to start the engine of revelation but they refuse.
They mimic how people they’ve watched drive and looked like they knew what they were doing, but they never left the garage and almost violently rejected any suggestions.
Resentment is the heart and soul of liberalism, and I’ve seen a lot of that when suggesting that the ‘scholars’ are wrong and not the Prophets.
Comments are closed.