My video review of the Book of Mormon Evidence conference

Steven Pynakker asked me to do a quick overview of the recent conference.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v-QzwvSUZM

One of the fun and educational aspects of these conferences is the diversity of thought and sharing of ideas. People come with open minds and enthusiasm about the Gospel. 

Kudos again to Mormon Book Reviews for helping people make informed decisions by giving a forum for multiple perspectives!

Source: About Central America

M2C citation cartel: Hanna Seriac and Brant Gardner

The article in the Salt Lake Tribune about the Heartlanders that we discussed recently is a useful example of how the M2C citation cartel works. I was reluctant to mention this further, but the ongoing efforts of the M2C citation cartel requires some pushback.

Every Latter-day Saint, particularly those affiliated with Book of Mormon Central, the Interpreter, and FAIRLDS, should denounce these efforts to falsely accuse their fellow Latter-day Saints. In particular, leaders such as Dan Peterson, Scott Gordon and Jack Welch should disavow the accusations made in this article.

If they don’t, we’ll revisit this problem more specifically.

In a way, it’s unthinkable that faithful Latter-day Saints would resort to deceitful statements to the media to demean and falsely accuse their fellow faithful Latter-day Saints

But sadly, this is merely a continuation of the efforts of the M2C citation cartel. And the silence of the cartel constitutes condoning what Hanna Seriac and Brant Gardner have done.

The problem would be immediately alleviated if the cartel would simply recognize that many faithful Latter-day Saints still accept the teachings of the prophets about the New York Cumorah and seek to corroborate those teachings. Why the cartel feels threatened by those teachings is another topic, but as we’ll see below, their envy of the rising popularity of the “Heartland” ideas does not justify their actions.

The cartel does immense harm to the Restoration by insisting that only their own private interpretations are legitimate and acceptable, even when their interpretations expressly repudiate the teachings of the prophets, as everyone can see.

But because the cartel and its members persist, we see Hanna Seriac and Brant Gardner, both of whom contribute to FAIRLDS, providing outrageous, deceitful comments about the “Heartlanders” they disdain, such as this one:

“Christian nationalism,” Seariac said, “fuels their interpretation of everything.”

We have to wonder why Hanna would lie to the media like this. She knows perfectly well that the only thing that defines “Heartlanders” is their belief in what the prophets have taught about the Hill Cumorah in New York and their belief in the latter-day scriptures.

So-called Heartlanders” are found throughout the world in a variety of nationalities, few of whom know or care about U.S. politics.

American Heartlanders live throughout the country and have a variety of political views and backgrounds. Even if, as Hanna insists, some “Heartlanders” separately express some elements of “Christian nationalism” (which she uses as a pejorative epithet), that certainly doesn’t “fuel their interpretation of everything.” To be clear, I disavow any racism, jingoism, or other un-Christian ideas and behavior, regardless of who advocates it. But I also deplore the efforts of Hanna and Brant to falsely attach these labels to their fellow Latter-day Saints.

To repeat: the only thing that defines “Heartlanders” is their belief in what the prophets have taught about the Hill Cumorah in New York. They have a variety of views about Book of Mormon geography and other topics, just like everyone else.

But the New York Cumorah is the one thing the M2Cers cannot tolerate.

Hanna, Brant, and their fellow associates at FairLDS have expressly repudiated the teachings of the prophets about the New York Cumorah. They don’t like it when people draw attention to what they teach, so they resort to diversionary tactics to discredit Heartlanders.

Here’s another example of their blatant deception in this article:

Heartlanders also tend to be anti-immigration, Seariac and Gardner said. In fact, both agreed that, more than any other belief or concern, this appears to be the driving force behind the current surge in support for the theory — that is, a sense among backers that not only their country but also their sacred text must be reclaimed from foreigners, specifically Latinos.

The way Heartlanders see it, if the Book of Mormon took place in the United States and not, as many Latter-day Saint scholars including Gardner argue, in Central America, then the Native Americans — not Central Americans — are the descendants of the Lamanites.

[Note: we can’t tell if this lie is the reporter’s spin or something that Hanna and Brant said, but we can clarify that “Heartlanders” have no problem with Central Americans being descendants of the Lamanites. That has never been an issue, except among M2Cers who seek to discredit Heartlanders. While the Doctrine and Covenants (28, 30, 32) specifically identified the Native Americans in New York, Ohio, and Missouri as “Lamanites,” that does not exclude any others from also being descendants of the Lamanites, whether during or after Book of Mormon time frames.]

Here is another deception that the M2C citation cartel has long promoted.

Seariac and Gardner explained that while this argument may seem nitpicky to outsiders, it has real-world consequences.

“It has allowed a very jingoistic, very racist approach to the Book of Mormon,” Gardner said. “And there are a lot of people that resonates with.”

It’s not only unthinkable but appalling, really, that these members of the M2C citation cartel would spread such lies about fellow Latter-day Saints. But it’s not new. They’ve been doing this for years.

The article explains Brant’s motivation.

Offline support [for the Heartlander ideas] also appears to be gaining ground, according to Brant Gardner, a Book of Mormon scholar who has written numerous books in defense of the Mesoamerican model.

“I see it frequently in wards and talking to people,” Gardner, who lives in New Mexico, said. “It’s a lot more prominent than it was.”

Exactly how popular the Heartland model has become is hard to say. As a reference, [Wayne] May points to the crowds he is able to draw when speaking at private events, estimating anywhere from 4,000 to 6,000 might attend the lectures over three days.

“There are a lot of Saints out there that are very, very interested in what we’re doing,” May said, “and they’re paying close attention.”

To this, Gardner grudgingly agreed. “We can’t get that many people to any of our conferences,” he said, referring to his own community of supporters of the Mesoamerican model. “It’s a point of envy.”

I doubt many Latter-day Saints agree with Brant that his envy justifies his libelous efforts to mislead the public about what his brothers and sisters in the Gospel actually think and teach. 

Some readers here may be unfamiliar with Hanna and Brant. Below are examples of the way they work with the M2C citation cartel.

As you can see, FAIRLDS, Book of Mormon Central, and the Interpreter are merely fronts for the M2C citation cartel. They have interlocking contributors and management. They cite and promote one another’s work.

They uniformly repudiate the teachings of the prophets, thinking that they be more influential by presenting three “separate” organizations to the public. They can also solicit donations separately.

Naturally, they insist they are actually three separate organizations, which is technically true. But you don’t have to look much past the facade to see how they coordinate their messages.

Now they’re co-opting the Salt Lake Tribune to promote their deceitful message.

To repeat: Everyone affiliated with these organizations, along with other members of the citation cartel, should denounce these efforts to falsely accuse their fellow Latter-day Saints.

Source: About Central America

Discussion of Letter VII on mobom.org

Mobom.org (Museum of the Book of Mormon) has a discussion of Letter VII here:

https://www.mobom.org/letter-vii-letter-seven

When he wrote Letter VII, Oliver Cowdery was Assistant President of the Church. Joseph Smith referred to him as President Cowdery because, as Assistant President, he was a member of the First Presidency and senior to the First and Second Counselors.

Letter VII is President Oliver Cowdery’s explanation of not only the fact of the location of the Hill Cumorah described in Mormon 6:6, but also the number of Jaredites and Nephites/Lamanites who died there (far fewer than often assumed). President Cowdery explained that Joseph helped him write these letters. 

Letter VII excerpt (click to enlarge)
Transcript:
“At about one mile west [of the Hill Cumorah in New York] rises another ridge of less height, running parallel with the former, leaving a beautiful vale between. The soil is of the first quality for the country, and under a state of cultivation, which gives a prospect at once imposing, when one reflects on the fact, that here, between these hills, the entire power and national strength of both the Jaredites and Nephites were destroyed.”

Source: Letter VII

L. E. Hills

It’s time for another annual posting about L.E. Hills.

As yet another example of how Book of Mormon Central dis-educates its readers, the only mention of RLDS scholar L.E. Hills, the inventor of M2C, on the website of book of Mormon Central is buried in John Sorenson’s Source Book.

https://archive.bookofmormoncentral.org/sites/default/files/archive-files/pdf/sorenson/2020-01-24/john_l._sorenson_the_geography_of_book_of_mormon_events_a_source_book_1990.pdf

Readers of this blog know a bit about Hills.

L.E. Hills in Sorenson’s Source Book

Source: About Central America

Thoughts on education

Some relevant tweets involving education. The one referencing China, while a hyperbolic, resonates with my personal experience comparing my Chinese with my American college students.

As always, I don’t care who said what. I’m interested in the merits of the observations per se. But no doubt my critics will focus on who said what and compete to see who can be the most deeply offended in their outrage theater.

🙂

_____

One of the signs of intelligence is to be able to accept the facts without being offended.

“Strong communities talk to each other.” –


Ours may become the first civilization destroyed, not by the power of our enemies, but by the ignorance of our teachers and the dangerous nonsense they are teaching our children. In an age of artificial intelligence, they are creating artificial stupidity.

Chinese third graders are learning multi-variable calculus. Our third graders are being taught that “men can have babies.” This will not end well.

“The closer you are to the truth, the more silent you become inside.” @naval

“People who live far below their means enjoy a freedom that people busy upgrading their lifestyles can’t fathom.” @naval

When you try to be all things to all people, you end up becoming nothing to everyone.

Source: Book of Mormon Concensus

Weaponization of stigma

One tactic our M2C friends employ to obfuscate the reality that they reject the teachings of the prophets about Cumorah is by weaponizing stigma. 

There are various terms for this tactic: Stigma manufacturing. Directed stigma. Prisoner of stigma. 

Weaponizing stigma is a common political strategy of making a person, group, or idea unacceptable by associating it with a mark of disgrace. Some recent infamous examples were Hillary Clinton’s “deplorables” caricature, Donald Trump’s “crooked Hillary,” “Sleepy Joe” and “Basement Biden” epithets, or Biden repeating the “fine people” hoax over and over. 

Weaponizing stigma is a form of psychological warfare, designed to deflect from the substantive issues. 
For many years, our M2C friends tried to pigeonhole “Heartlanders” as naive, undereducated and uncredentialed, thus unworthy of consideration. They still pursue that tactic, but it backfires because the academic arrogance of the credentialed class is not only obvious but distasteful to most Latter-day Saints.
Lately they’ve resorted to manufacturing a stigma based on claims that “Heartlanders” are right-wing white nationalists who oppose immigration.
For example, FAIRLDS contributor and former Maxwell Institute researcher Hanna Seriac claims “Christian nationalism fuels their interpretation of everything…. They tend to be anti-vaxxers and to post about QAnon and are just prone to conspiratorial thinking.”
She’s apparently oblivious to her own conspiratorial thinking she expresses here. 
Worse, she knows perfectly well that there is no monolithic “Heartlander” political ideology and that there are Heartlanders around the world who not only don’t know much about American politics, but couldn’t care less. She knows because she and I have discussed this. But she won’t say it publicly because it contradicts the narrative she is promoting to further her career.
Non-American “Heartlanders” are simply ordinary Latter-day Saints who still believe the teachings of the prophets and want to learn about extrinsic evidence that corroborates those teachings. 
Just like many American Latter-day Saints of various political persuasions. Some of us are more liberal or conservative than others. Some have different national origins, cultural backgrounds, experiences, beliefs, priorities, etc.
IOW, Heartlanders are diverse and embrace diversity of all forms. We seek unity through diversity.
Nevertheless, Hanna relies on a particular blogger to perpetuate her caricature of “Heartlanders” so she can manufacture a stigma that, she hopes, will deter Latter-day Saints and others from learning about and considering the merits of what “Heartlanders” are saying about the Book of Mormon and Church history overall.  
Not that Hanna is alone in her efforts. Brant Gardner, webmaster for the Interpreter and author of many M2C-promoting books and articles, assiduously opposes the “Heartlander” ideas and embraces the stigma tactic. “It has allowed a very jingoistic, very racist approach to the Book of Mormon,” Gardner said. “And there are a lot of people that resonates with.” 
While the type of virtue signaling Hanna and Brant express undoubtedly comforts the M2Cers and reinforces their sense of intellectual and credentialed superiority, it perpetuates stereotypes and generates further division.
To be clear, I like Hanna and Brant personally. They’re good people, sincere, and undoubtedly doing what they think is necessary to promote their own beliefs. I like and respect most people with whom I disagree because to me, none of this is personal. We’re all in this together; everyone is seeking truth, trying to make the world a better place, etc. 
In my view, though, creating and weaponizing stigma is counterproductive. We are dealing with two separate issues: politics, and Book of Mormon historicity.
I favor plurality and consideration of multiple working hypotheses. 
I like to lay out all the facts, spell out the various assumptions people make about that evidence, draw inferences and interpretations, thread them together, and then articulate the hypotheses. That lets everyone make informed decisions.
But in my experience, the M2Cers not only don’t want such openness, they actively oppose it. 
Even if they have to weaponize stigma to confuse people so they can retain their status as the “Interpreters” for those they deem (and stigmatize as) lesser Latter-day Saints.
.

Source: About Central America

Kinderhook plates interview

The Kinderhook plates have been controversial ever since 1843. Apologists and critics have debated the historical facts and extrinsic evidence for years.

Yesterday I did an interview about them on the Mormon Book Reviews channel on YouTube. See it here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADH6y0iHE40

The show notes 

BTW, if you haven’t subscribed to the Mormon Book Reviews channel, you should now. Steve is an effective, interesting, and interested interviewer who seeks ways to build bridges and understanding among people of all beliefs.

I should mention that while I think the chapter in the Kinderhook plates in the book Producing Ancient Scripture is outstanding for its thorough treatment of the historical evidence, as I mentioned in the video there is a gap in the analysis that the authors understandably skipped over but should not be ignored.
And although I endorsed that article, I don’t endorse or agree with all the chapters in that book. 

 

Source: Letter VII

Blog post about why I am not an intellectual

I saw this on the Times and Seasons blog and thought it made a good point.

Why I am Not An Intellectual

2. Intellectualism does not make you generically competent

Gradually I came to realize that specializing in an area just means that you are really knowledgeable in that area. The research on “transfer of learning” is highly debatable, but my reading is that learning a skill in one area does not help your generic abilities as much as one might think. I gradually realized that the mathematics genius doesn’t necessarily have more sophisticated political opinions….

Of course, it is wonderful that we have specialists, but being an intellectual in one area doesn’t tap you into a generalizable divine-like wisdom for multiple areas. If you want to be an “intellectual,” that does not give you a right to speak authoritatively on anything that you haven’t actually studied, whether it’s politics, ethics, or social issues; it doesn’t make you some wise uber-human. 

https://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php/2022/02/why-i-am-not-an-intellectual/

Source: Book of Mormon Concensus